This is your reptilian brain on depression
Deep within every one of us is a brain structure called the Reptilian Complex. It is an ancient and powerful piece of biological machinery, having been part of every vertebrate creature ever to walk the earth or swim the seas. It’s in us, too, and handles the jobs we can’t be bothered to think about all the time, like keeping our hearts beating and breathing.
But for writers, the Reptilian Complex has a much more important job. It is also responsible for the Fight-or-Flight response, the basic survival instinct of all animals—people included—when threatened or cornered: fight, or run away.
Fight-or-Flight and Depression
Readers of this blog will well remember that depression is one of the five stages of grief that give such a useful roadmap for how characters respond when confronted with misfortunes. Had I been cleverer when writing that article on depression, I would have realized the connection between depression and the fight-or-flight response. Alas, I wasn’t, but better late than never.
What keeps people stuck in the depression stage, you’ll recall, is that anxious feeling of not seeing a way out of a bad situation. “Doomxiety,” I called it. In hindsight, this now seems obvious to me, but I didn’t see it at the time. Feeling trapped triggers the Reptilian Complex to initiate that fight-or-flight response.
I want to talk about flight first, because there’s a stronger connection to that sense of feeling trapped. The core of five-stage depression is not seeing any way out of a bad situation, so flight makes sense: running away, in one form or another, is a means to create a way out.
When do characters flee?
But notice, people don’t just immediately run away from bad situations all the time. In fact, flight is usually a last resort, and that’s because flight always involves sacrifice. The choice to run away always means leaving behind something that is of value to the character; if this weren’t so, the character wouldn’t have felt trapped in the first place, because the flight option—which was always there—would have had no down side.
The only thing keeping the character from always fleeing is an unwillingness to leave behind the parts of that bad situation that matter to them. Take bad marriages, for example. People stay in bad marriages all the time, because even if they’re totally unhappy with their spouse, there’s still something about the situation that the person values. Something that makes the flight option unacceptable. Maybe they can’t stand to leave the children, maybe the person came from a poor background but married into money and can’t stand the thought of being poor again, whatever. Something’s keeping them there.
Only when the situation becomes so bad that it outweighs the good parts will a person—or a character—finally choose to run away.
How do characters flee?
When a character finally opts to leave the bad situation behind, no matter the cost, he or she has some options. These fall into three broad buckets:
Panicked flight. This is literal fleeing, a rushed, haphazard, often terrified physical exit from a situation. Lots of yelling and screaming, flailing of arms, you get the picture. This kind of flight is perfect for situations where the character is threatened, but doesn’t have any strong emotional investments in the situation itself. Let’s say your character is walking down the street on his way to a cafe for lunch, when a mugger jumps out of an alley brandishing a knife. Sure, losing out on lunch is, technically, a sacrifice but it’s not a big one. Why wouldn’t he run? Especially if the mugger looks a bit on the fat-and-slow side, why wouldn’t the character run? What earth would make him stay and fight? I mean, is he so committed to getting a ham-on-rye that he’s willing to risk getting knifed? Of course not. In situations like this, a sudden threat that is not coupled to a significant sacrifice, flight makes perfect sense.
Methodical flight. This is a planned escape from a bad situation. Maybe it’s a jailbreak, but this fits any situation where the situation has become so bad that uprooting one’s whole life (or some significant chunk of it) isn’t too much of a sacrifice. These are the dads who go out for cigarettes and just never come back, the employees who just walk out even with no new job to go to. The amount of planning may vary; your typical jailbreak novel will involve an enormous amount of planning, while the deadbeat dad may simply have left with nothing but a wallet and a gym bag hastily stuffed with clothes and a razor. The difference is a lack of panic. This kind of flight is appropriate when the sacrifice is great, but there is no particular rush to escape. Use this when the character has plenty of time to consider the situation before deciding to flee.
Existential flight. This, in a word, is suicide. Suicide, when the result of five-stage depression, is a form of flight. People and characters do this when they’re so convinced there’s no way out of their bad situation except to stop living. This is when a character believes that even picking up stakes and starting over somewhere else won’t actually get them out of the bad situation. Obviously, this is the ultimate last resort, and you should think very, very carefully before putting a character on that path. For one thing, we shouldn’t make light in our novels of what in real life is one of the worst kinds of personal tragedies. For another thing, suicide isn’t going to work in your novel unless you’ve created a situation where the sacrifice—literally everything in the character’s life including all possible future experiences—isn’t enough to outweigh the pain of the bad situation the character is in. To make that believable in a novel is a pretty tall order. There’s no question suicide has its place in literature, but—and I apologize for the wording here—it’s not easy to do it right.
When do characters fight?
The fight half of Fight-or-Flight also relates to the depression stage, but in a different way. Fighting can be the key to reaching acceptance. You can create some powerful moments when the trapped feelings behind depression trigger a fight response. These are moments when the character says “there must be some way out of this, and I’m going to find it!” Tons of great drama there. If you’re looking for a way to get your character into the acceptance stage, this can be a wonderful option because—assuming your readers are actually rooting for your character—they want to see the character reach acceptance. They want to see him push through, survive, win.
You can bring on moments like this in a million different ways. You could have a character fall back on pride or stubbornness as a reason not to flee. You could have the choice to fight come from the culmination of an inner character arc: “Daddy always said I was a no-good loser, but I’m not, damn him, I’m not! And I won’t be now!”
However you bring it on, the common theme behind all of these fight responses is the character realizing that the sacrifice attached to fleeing is just too great. The stubborn, prideful character isn’t willing to sacrifice self-image. The child of the abusive father isn’t willing to sacrifice the personal growth he has already made. Whatever it is, fighting is what characters do when you’ve coupled their bad situation to something of extreme personal value to them.
When our characters realize that nothing is so bad as to be worth that level of sacrifice, that’s when they fight back.
April 30, 2010 18:54 UTC
7 Comments:
Posted by John on May 01, 2010 12:18 UTC
I disagree that “flight always involves sacrifice". Your premise falls apart under examination.
You suggest that the self-preservation instinct always results in a net loss of some kind (that’s what sacrifice is, a loss). In fact, the opposite is almost always true. There’s a gain that exceeds any loss, resulting in a net gain; otherwise, the flight response wouldn’t have evolved. Using your example, the character on his way to lunch who flees the mugger is slightly inconvenienced by having to reschedule lunch, but he avoids a much greater potential loss involving money, injury or death. The net gain of health far exceeds the minor inconvenience of being diverted from lunch. There is no sacrifice at all.
Here’s another example of a flight response that involves no sacrifice at all. You are crossing the street on the light when you see a car heading toward you, which is obviously going to run the light and hit you if you don’t move out of the way. Your flight response kicks in, you break into a run and get across the street, avoiding what would have been certain death. What have you sacrificed? You got across the street faster, so you didn’t sacrifice time. The only thing you “sacrificed” is some adrenaline.
Posted by Deborah on May 01, 2010 13:45 UTC
Excellent post.
American poet, Robert Bly, has been talking and writing about the structure of the human brain. He defines the three brains as reptilian, mammalian and the new brain. And this has deeply affected my thinking as well as my poetry and fiction.
I so appreciate you for laying out these fight-or-flight conflicts writers need to examine in their works in progress. And I hope you will write more on this topic, I’ll be sharing this on Twitter, Facebook, and with my writers group.
Posted by Julia Karr on May 01, 2010 13:58 UTC
Great article. Good stuff to think about and assess in light of one’s character. How, specifically, would this particular character respond when trapped? If you truly know you characters, the response will be the natural outgrowth - either they are on a path of victory or defeat - a the writer needs to be aware of that. Some characters will flee - only to return later & fight, some will stay & fight, while others will give up. A good writer will bring their book to the right conclusion.
Posted by Jason Black on May 01, 2010 23:17 UTC
@John:
I didn’t say net loss. I said sacrifice. Obviously flight, at the moment someone chooses it, represents a net gain or else it would never make sense to run. (Except, I would argue, in the case of suicide but that’s a whole other discussion.)
Also note, I wasn’t talking about fight-or-flight in the context of random events like busses on the street. I’m talking about fight-or-flight in the specific context of the depression stage of the “five stages of grief,” which I’ve talked about quite a lot elsewhere on this blog.
Fight-or-flight can certainly be triggered by any number of stimuli—including the occasional bus. What I’m saying in this article is that the trapped, cornered emotion that comes about from being in the depression stage of a five-stages sequence can also trigger the fight-or-flight response.
And when it does, the decision (and make no mistake, it is a decision and not an instinctive reaction as in the bus case) always involves sacrifice. This is inherent in the kinds of situations that bring about five-stage responses, especially the ones that are serious and cause a non-trivial amount of depression.
Take my brother in law, who shall remain nameless for obvious reasons. He’s as nice a guy as you could want to meet, but he’s not great with money. A while back, in fact, he got into quite a bit of debt that he couldn’t easily deal with. He had creditors harassing him all the time and everything. And, he was pretty down about it.
Now, in that situation, he’s got some choices. Look for a better job, take a second job, sell his car, file for bankruptcy, and yes, leave town in the dead of night. Flight, whether sensible or not, was one of his options.
In his case, he didn’t flee. Why? Because the sacrifice would have been too great. No way his girlfriend was going to pick up stakes and flee to Mexico to live under an assumed name. He has family nearby, so fleeing would have meant leaving them behind, too. It would mean giving up—sacrificing—his friends, his job, his townhouse, and basically everything he’d worked to build up in his life.
One could understand if he’d ever contemplated just running away from the problem (I’ve never asked), because cleaning up that situation is downright embarassing. Having to admit that you’ve messed up your life in some pretty big ways is, well, it’s humiliating. So emotionally, there’s a draw towards running.
But he didn’t run, because the sacrifice was too great. The magnitude of the sacrifice involved in splitting town under the cover of night greatly exceeded the humiliations involved in getting himself out of the financial hole he’d dug. So, he made the rational choice. He cut back on his expenses, got credit counseling, et cetera.
Now: in that same situation, let his girlfriend dump him. Let his family members get killed in a car accident. Let his townhouse get reposessed. Let his friends shun him for being such a loser. Then what? Take away everything that, previously, would have been a sacrifice, then the equation changes. Take away all the good stuff that kept him rooted to his life in that city, but leave him with the burden of humiliation involved in cleaning up his financial troubles, and yeah. Maybe running away makes more sense then.
That’s what I’m saying. In these situations of depression, when the fight-or-flight response gets triggered by feeling trapped in the situation, the decision to flee always involves sacrifice. Running away—especially in a novel that you hope to publish someday—should never be used as a get out of jail free card for your characters.
Posted by Alicia Blade on May 07, 2010 13:44 UTC
I love it when I stumble across a blog post that deals with the exact problem I’m having with my novel right now. This was excellently written and makes so much sense. Thank you!
Off to read your 5 stages of grief post now...
Posted by Jason Black on May 07, 2010 16:26 UTC
@Alicia Blade:
Glad to help, and thank you for the kind words! If there’s anything else you’re having trouble with in your novel, feel free to suggest topics for me to blog about.
And that goes for the rest of you, too!



Posted by angela on April 30, 2010 21:15 UTC
<i>flight always involves sacrifice</i>
I love this. I never thought about it this way, but you’re absolutely right, as always! Thanks for this great post!